Send me an email, look at the old ravings, or post a comment below. Thanks!
Well, go on. What do you have to say for your self?
Comments
27 May 2017 11:09:26 Perry
Great stuff! Thanks for making it available, Mikael.
26 Apr 2013 04:14:24 VBCurtis
OK. I'll run ECM at 43e6, and perhaps GNFS a couple selections on 13-. I agree that your found-factors list looks like more than a T40 has been run, which is why I'm skipping 11e6.
25 Apr 2013 17:00:54 mklasson
VBCurtis: The k=15 numbers have had considerably less ecm done though, only up to about 35 digits.
22 Apr 2013 23:51:49 mklasson
VBCurtis: I'm not entirely sure, but looking at the top ecm factors suggests enough ecm has been done to eliminate most factors < ~41 or so digits? Laurent Fousse did a _lot_ of ecm on these numbers back in 2005.
20 Apr 2013 04:06:34 VBCurtis
How much ECM work have these numbers had? I'd like to have a go at the 13- list, but I prefer to not waste effort.
