Send me an email, look at the old ravings, or post a comment below. Thanks!

Well, go on. What do you have to say for your self?

Comments
Your name?


Alright, what's 3 + 4 then?
Let's hear it:
26 Apr 2013 04:14:24  VBCurtis
OK. I'll run ECM at 43e6, and perhaps GNFS a couple selections on 13-. I agree that your found-factors list looks like more than a T40 has been run, which is why I'm skipping 11e6.
25 Apr 2013 17:00:54  mklasson
VBCurtis: The k=15 numbers have had considerably less ecm done though, only up to about 35 digits.
22 Apr 2013 23:51:49  mklasson
VBCurtis: I'm not entirely sure, but looking at the top ecm factors suggests enough ecm has been done to eliminate most factors < ~41 or so digits? Laurent Fousse did a _lot_ of ecm on these numbers back in 2005.
20 Apr 2013 04:06:34  VBCurtis
How much ECM work have these numbers had? I'd like to have a go at the 13- list, but I prefer to not waste effort.
31 Jan 2010 22:48:36  mklasson
Cheers zhorkon! I sincerely doubt the hexit source is of much use to anyone, but I've sent it to people who have asked for it in the past.

I'd be happy to have a look at your updated .ODF file. If you could email it to me that'd be great. Thanks!
Show all comments
© Mikael Klasson (anything @ this site)
® 04 Jun 2012 21:34:38